THE EVIDENCE

Less scrolling.
More thinking.

Research, ideas, and practical ways to build a more intentional internet.

The internet is remarkably good at keeping us engaged. But engagement and intention aren't always the same thing. The Dedoom Dispatch explores the psychology of digital attention, doomscrolling, short-form content, behavioral design, digital wellbeing, and the habits that shape how we use technology.

πŸ“‘6 Peer-Reviewed Enquiries
πŸ”¬PubMed & PNAS Citations
Behavioral Design Over Guilt
Zero Ragebait
πŸ”

No articles matched your query

Try searching for keywords like "doomscrolling", "willpower", "Shorts", or "friction".

Tactics & Guides

Why Short-Form Feeds Are So Hard to Put Down

Infinite feeds, unpredictable rewards, and what the research actually says about attention. Why dopamine is an incomplete explanation, and why selective content hiding works.

πŸ”¬ 2026 Systematic Review (46,912 cohort)
Research & Behavior

Can a Three-Second Pause Change What You Do Next?

What one real-world experiment tells us about friction, self-nudging, and digital habits. Findings from the 2023 PNAS field study on why deliberate pauses beat blunt restrictions.

πŸ”¬ PNAS 2023 Field Experiment (280 participants)
Comparisons & Teardowns

App Blocking vs Content Hiding

Why blocking an entire platform isn't always the same as removing the distraction. A surgical comparison of removing YouTube Shorts while keeping lectures and tutorials accessible.

🎯 Precision Intervention Analysis
Tactics & Guides

Screen Time Doesn't Tell the Whole Story

Two people can spend three hours online and have completely different digital lives. Why total hours is a crude metric, and why behavioral intentionality is the real goal.

πŸ“Š Social-Media Multitasking Review
Philosophy & Habits

The Intentional Internet

What if digital wellbeing wasn't about using the internet less, but using it better? Moving beyond subtraction and deprivation toward conscious agency online.

πŸ’‘ Agency & Behavior Design
THE DEDOOM DISPATCH MANIFESTO

Research, not ragebait.

The internet already has enough confident opinions about dopamine, addiction, algorithms, and attention.

We want to do something slightly different. When we cite research, we link to the underlying work. When evidence is correlational, we say so. When evidence is preliminary, we say so. And when something is our own interpretation, we don't pretend a researcher said it.

Because digital wellbeing deserves better than another listicle. It deserves curiosity, evidence, and a little more thinking.